Friday, October 24, 2008

Limit Up, Limit Down

The pre-market indications today are showing that U.S. stocks will open at their down limit. That, is the safety mechanisms built into the trading platforms will stop share prices from going lower than the allowable limit.  This means that the DJIA futures won't trade below the 8,224 level and Nasdaq 100 futures won't fall below 1,168.50.  This represents a drop of approximately 400 on each of these indexes.

I also heard an interesting perspective from a floor trader this morning, that it wasn't too long ago, (late 1990's) when limit-up days were pretty common.  It strikes me that it has taken a long time for the market in general to rationalize the high valuations of the late 90's.  I don't mean to imply that all stocks have been overvalued, but broad equity indexes probably have been too exposed to overvaluations.  

If you are a long-term owner / buyer of equities, the stock markets look to be a LOT less risky now.

As always, prudence and balance pay off.  

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Excitement Continues

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 514 points today, apparently on worries that corporate earnings for the third quarter will be disappointing.  It is now becoming clear to the masses that the expected slowdown in the economy will materialize.

For long-term investors in stocks (the only time frame that applies to stock investments), this volatility and weakness will continue to present opportunities to make investments at reasonable valuations.  We believe that our attention to overall diversification, cash management,  and prudent investing will reward our clients over time, and we encourage you to stick to your plan.

If you are a participant in a corporate retirement plan, where you have the opportunity to "dollar cost average" into a diversified portfolio, consider the fact that everything's on sale, and you are going to load up your shopping cart with a lot more items than you could buy for many years.

If you are approaching retirement, this is a good time to be overweight in cash and bonds.  We tend to take a very cautious approach with portfolios as they reach the retirement years (now  you should really enjoy your bond ladder).  We certainly don't ignore growth investments for retirement, but only after stress-testing your personal situation would we then recommend gradually adjusting to a balanced position between cash, bonds and stocks.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Jason Zweig's WSJ Column on Tuesday

As much as I enjoy providing original thoughts here, I feel compelled to pass along some of the better columns I've read recently regarding personal finance and investing (with proper credit, of course).  I read the Wall Street Journal pretty regularly, and have come to enjoy Jason Zweig's column, "The Intelligent Investor".  

Instead of summarizing, here is the October 7 column.  Enjoy!

So do you feel like quitting yet?

If Monday's 800-point intraday plunge in the Dow Jones Industrial Average made you want to give up and get out of stocks, you're not alone.

[As the Dow drops: A trader at the New York Stock Exchange on Monday.]Michael Nagle for The Wall Street Journal

As the Dow drops: A trader at the New York Stock Exchange on Monday.

I've written column after column advising investors to buy stocks on the way down, and readers are in pain. "You say not to bail," one reader emailed me over the weekend, "but all funds are down. ... This whole stock market has me so upset, [I feel] like a deer in the headlights." Another wrote: "We are, you see, about to enter another Great Depression, just like the last one only much worse. ... It's way too early to be buying stocks. ... Or I could be really nasty and ask you which brokerage house paid you to run this stupid column now."

Right or wrong, I work only for The Wall Street Journal. But what all of us are feeling is the loss of control we sense when we are faced with anything that is frightening, inexplicable and important.

That lack of control not only makes us feel powerless; it also changes the way we view the world. Very small amounts of fragmentary information can suddenly seem to be fraught with meaning: Did something move on "the grassy knoll" the day John F. Kennedy was assassinated? Will one down day in the stock market lead to another and another?

Even the greatest investors have felt the same kind of fear and pain you are probably feeling. For proof, look no further than "Security Analysis," the classic textbook by Benjamin Graham and David Dodd, which has just been reissued in a commemorative edition. Graham was one of the best money managers of the 20th century, a brilliant analyst and market historian, and Warren Buffett's most influential teacher and mentor.

The new book reprints the text of the 1940 printing, in which Graham addressed the market devastation of the previous decade. Just as the roughly 90% fall between 1929 and 1932 had seemed to be fading, the stock market dropped sharply again in the late 1930s. As market historian James Grant puts it, by the time Graham was ready to finish the 1940 edition, "He had had it."

That helps explain one of the great ironies of market commentary. Graham himself stuck largely with stocks in his investment fund. But at the conclusion of his book, he advised the institutional investors among his readers to shun the stock market entirely and invest in bonds. Graham doubted they could stomach "the heavy responsibilities and the recurring uncertainties" stirred up by stocks.

How does the feeling of being overwhelmed affect investors? Research conducted by psychologists Jennifer Whitson of the University of Texas and Adam Galinsky of Northwestern University shows how it changes our perceptions. In one of their experiments, people were first rattled by a computer that gave them unpredictable feedback on their performance at a trivial task, stripping them of their sense of control. These people became much more likely to perceive shapes in a swarm of random dots.

"When you sense that you have a lack of control," says Prof. Whitson, "you're much more likely to try twisting and pretzeling explanations and seeing patterns that aren't even there."

In a related experiment, investors who had been stripped of their sense of control by market volatility were convinced that they had read more negative evidence about a company than they had actually seen -- and were less willing to buy the company's stock.

In other words, when our sense of control is threatened, we feel the natural urge to pretend that whatever information we do have is more complete and reliable than it is. Imagining that we know what's coming next (even if we think it will be bad) gives us a slight feeling of comfort.

As an investor, however, it's absolutely vital to separate what you can truly control from what is beyond your control. The only thing you can know for sure is that stocks are steadily getting cheaper. You cannot control whether or not the market will continue to trash stocks, but you can control how you respond.

If we are not headed into a depression, panic hardly seems justifiable.

What if we are?

Even during the Great Depression, the best investment results were earned not by the people who fled stocks for the safety of bonds and cash, but by those who stepped up and bought stocks and kept buying on the way down. A man named Floyd Odlum made millions of dollars putting his cash into battered stocks. His motto throughout the market nightmare of 1929 to 1932 never changed: "There's a better chance to make money now than ever before."

Friday, August 15, 2008

Late Summer Thoughts

With all of the stock market volatility this summer, we've been spending a lot of time thinking about how to best adopt our long-term strategies to the current economic situation. Obviously, nobody likes to adjust things too often, as that can quickly unravel any sound investment approach.  But certain characteristics of the U.S. economy deserve some attention, such as:

  • The return of inflation.  We are glad we started factoring in a significantly higher rate into our projections at the beginning of 2007.  It didn't really feel right at the time, but we felt that higher energy costs would start to affect both businesses and consumers at some point in the near future.  Sorry to say that we were right, but we're glad we took a more conservative approach.
  • A significant credit crisis.  The bursting of the housing bubble and the unraveling of various creative and unsound credit vehicles will have a long-term impact on the world economy.  This period feels a lot like the S&L crisis of the 1980's.  We hope it won't get much worse than that.
  • Another round of excess brought on by Wall Street "rocket scientists".  It seems that the geniuses responsible for cooking up ever more creative ways to offload risks to the next sucker in line have succeeded again.  The drive for higher and higher profits by publicly-traded investment firms and banks continually create unsound and risky investment vehicles for the public AND institutions.  It's too bad that the average guy and gal on Main Street are going to pick up the tab for this one.  This will create added pressure on our tax system and will probably make for an interesting election year.  
  • Significant pressure on our domestic economy brought on by defense, healthcare, rationalizing of certain industries (i.e. automobile manufacturing) and infrastructure demands.  The citizens of the U.S. will have to pay this tab some day, and maybe pretty soon.
On the upside, stocks are now possibly reaching bargain levels, not every company is having a difficult time, gasoline prices are declining, and some of what we are experiencing is the necessary side effect of asset overvaluations (what goes up, must come down).  

As investors, we preach balance in portfolios at all times, and we constantly search for areas of opportunity, whether it's in bonds, real estate, commodities, hedged instruments or equities.  A certain degree of "stay the course" is prudent in times like this, and a more focused approach to investments is in order (in our opinion).  While we like the cost efficiencies of indexed investments, we don't think that you should willy-nilly spread your holdings over very broad markets.  That is certainly a prescription for mediocrity at best, and possibly could lead to significant underperformance due to over-exposure to specific stocks or asset-classes.  

We think that now is a good time to "get back to basics" and adjust your approach to high-quality companies that are well managed and possibly have international exposure.  We favor investment managers who have a long-term track record and who focus on fundamentals.  

Think about companies like McDonald's, arguably the world-leader in fast food and a company that had many operational problems a few years ago, but now appears to have gotten a handle on their problems and are doing quite well.  

Other companies that are well-managed and are quality names:  
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Apple Computer
  • IBM
  • Celgene
  • Disney
  • GE
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Kinder Morgan Energy, LP
  • United Technologies
You get the picture.  These are companies that have been around for a while, will probably be here for many years, and are good at what they do.  We like to see these companies held by mutual funds and where appropriate, in our portfolios.  We like stocks like these even more if they pay a dividend, but that's a topic for another time.